The article, titled “Sexual Paranoia Strikes Academe,” discussed university policies governing sexual misconduct, student-faculty relationships and speech on campuses. It described lawsuits between a Northwestern philosophy professor and two students who accused him of sexual assault. Students took issue with the piece, saying Kipnis was describing a real-life scenario and that her facts were off. They accused Kipnis of retaliatory behavior and creating a hostile environment, and the school opened an investigation into the case. Complainants in the case told The Huffington Post that they reached out to Kipnis about their concerns, and she did not offer to correct her piece. They then turned to the Chronicle and asked for specific corrections. One sticking point was Kipnis’ assertion that in the second case she described, the unnamed professor and the graduate student were dating. In a similar case on campus, the student in question has said she was not dating the professor. The Chronicle has since changed its wording to say that “according to his complaint,” the professor and student had previously dated.
Phil Roeder I have been teaching for the last seven years. They are lucky enough to have been accepted by my school in the first place — yes, you have heard of it, and yes, it is that good. And that wide-eyed appreciation looks better on no one than an year-old brunette with perfect breasts and a tight sweater. The first time she walked into my classroom, I knew that I could have her. I found her honest interest in me adorable, and her fumbling little attempts to seduce me the first day or so of class to be as endearing as they were effective.
She could have never spoken to me and still held me just as captivated.
Even if the professor isn’t the student’s teacher when the relationship starts, problems could arise if the student ends up in the professor’s class later on. As a member of the faculty, the professor holds power over the student. Many schools discourage professor/student dating for these reasons.
It may be a further coincidence that the missing men were all later determined to have wandered off alone to a nearby river, accidentally fell in and — apparently incapacitated by alcohol — couldn’t get out before drowning to death. But it’s not a coincidence that at many of the different accident scenes, the same graffiti symbol had been scrawled depicting a “smiley face. When something occurs the first time, it’s a happenstance. If the same thing occurs again, it’s a coincidence.
At the third occurrence, it’s a pattern. To be sure, the matching graffiti may not have anything to do with the actual cause and manner of death in the matching missing person cases. Obviously the symbols are not just an accidental coincidence. However, anyone could’ve left the distinct markings at any time — for any reason. Detectives Gannon and Duarte, the retired police officers who traveled the country and came upon the signs, have reported very few details about their findings. Maybe they were only seeing evidence of a sick joke.
While not very likely, some person or group of people who had researched these mystery drownings could have arranged to mark the scenes some time after the deaths. Based on what little the detectives have revealed, it would appear equally unlikely the strange graffiti markings represent a nationwide gang of serial killers. The significance of the findings is impossible to judge without knowing the extent and credibility of this new evidence.
# All The Dating Advice, Again
From Tim Blair on FoxNews. My 11 years of experience in the editorial writing business lead me to strongly support your point about the counterproductive nature of Coulter-style rhetoric. When a writer advances arguments while refraining from impugning the integrity of those on the opposite side of an issue, that writer will build up capital among thoughtful readers.
That capital, in the form of reader respect, can later come in handy for a writer or a newspaper’s editorial page staff when taking an unpopular or unexpected position.
It can give a new student an immediate sense of belonging, something that grad school doesn’t offer easily. Suddenly you are part of your professor’s gang. But in the long run, this gets you nowhere, and it will probably turn you into a total asshole.
May 9, A scenario that has been raising concern on college campuses might go something like this: He is a middle-aged English professor, an expert on Henry James, who appears worldly and sophisticated in his tweed jacket while lecturing to his class. She is an year-old freshman, starry eyed and entranced by her teacher’s apparent brilliance and sensitivity. He is flattered by her attention. An after-class tutorial leads to drinks.
Drinks lead to a sexual encounter. Are they two consenting adults in love, or is it sexual harassment and exploitation? The appropriateness of faculty-student dating is being discussed on campuses throughout Westchester, echoing a nationwide debate about whether such relationships should be tolerated, regulated or banned altogether.
Faculty members at the University of Virginia recently voted to prohibit sexual relationships between professors and the students they supervise. A more stringent regulation, which would have banned romance between all professors and undergraduates, was voted down. A survey of Westchester colleges and universities revealed that no formal policies addressing faculty-student dating are in place, but many schools said that a prohibition against such relationships is implicit in other policies regulating professional conduct.
But administrators, professors and students alike say that the issue of faculty-student dating is a complex one. Some say that the unequal power in a relationship between a student and a faculty member — particularly one who is in a position to grade or make recommendations about the student he or she is dating — is inherently exploitative.
History & discoveries
Washington University Policy on Consensual Romantic or Sexual Relationships Between Faculty, Staff or Students Policy Statement When one partner to a consensual romantic, dating or sexual relationship holds a position of academic or professional authority with respect to the other partner in connection with their University roles, the potential may exist for favoritism, breach of trust, abuse of power, or conflicts of interest.
Such situations may also raise questions concerning the consensual nature of the relationship. To avoid those potential concerns, the University requires that when a consensual relationship exists or has existed in which one partner currently holds a position of academic or professional authority with respect to the other partner in connection with their University roles, the partners must promptly report the situation to their supervisor, department chair or dean and arrangements must be made to eliminate the position of authority.
Undergraduates The University prohibits consensual relationships between undergraduate students and faculty members, and between undergraduate students and employees in administrative or staff roles having broad authority over undergraduate students e. Noncompliance with Policy Violation of this policy may result in a range of remedial and disciplinary actions, including but not limited to mandatory training or counseling, reprimand, probation, suspension, loss of privileges, demotion, expulsion, dismissal or termination.
Faculty Rights Nothing in this policy is intended to abridge the rights of faculty as outlined in the Washington University Policy on Academic Freedom, Responsibility, and Tenure.
Professors Dating Students, Professors Harassing Students. By In Glaser and Thorpe’s (, 49) survey of former graduate students, all female, about their sexual involvement with professors, nearly all reported that they ‘felt no coercion or exploitation whatsoever.’ it could be that the overall reduction in the number of.
Getty Images Harvard University has banned professors from having sexual relationships with, or dating, undergraduate students, joining an increasing number of U. The new rules prohibit practices that until now were only advised to be inappropriate. Faculty members are now explicitly forbidden to have sex with, or date, undergraduate students, and with graduate students under their supervision. The university’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences Committee on Sexual Misconduct Policy and Procedures determined that the school’s existing language on “relationships of unequal status” was not strong enough.
Harvard’s ban on relationships between faculty and undergraduates follows similar bans that have been instituted in other schools, including the University of Connecticut, Arizona State University and Yale University. A Yale spokesperson told Bloomberg that several faculty members had been disciplined since the ban was instituted in Harvard is among 85 U.
A Harvard University representative says its new policy on sex between professors and students was created after a review found its old approach “did not explicitly reflect the faculty’s expectations. The change comes as the school examines its rules and undergoes a federal review. Last year, Harvard was among dozens of schools the Department of Education said it’s investigating for how they handle sexual abuse allegations.
A Harvard representative says that the new policy was created after a review by a Faculty of Arts and Sciences committee found that “the existing language on relationships of unequal status did not explicitly reflect the faculty’s expectations of what constituted an appropriate relationship between undergraduate students and faculty members.
Dating a graduate professor i hope it’s ethical my husband was a graduate dating a graduate rihanna dating a soccer player professor student at the university i’m a professor at, in a different department professor student relationship ethics in the same school, when.
It is an excellent question, especially at the start of the conference and job season. O, you graduate students! What am I going to do with you? How am I going to explain to you all of the ways that you sabotage and undermine yourselves, with the best of intentions, and with complete lack of self-awareness? So I will do what I can. I will list the ways that grad students act like grad students.
I will name the behavior, describe it, and then explain how and why that behavior sabotages you in a job market situation. You drone on and on about your dissertation. Stop talking about your dissertation!!!!!
Millennials Are Screwed
There is some statistical as well as anecdotal support for the view that students know that these relationships are exploitative. The recent decision of the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal in the case of Fariba Mahmoodi, a student who accused her professor of sexual harassment, has once again focussed attention on a controversial issue. Mahmoodi complained to the tribunal that Donald Dutton, a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia, and UBC as his employer, had sexually harassed her.
The tribunal agreed, awarding her a total of , including , for injury to her dignity, feelings and self-respect, and , for counseling expenses. The other problem for faculty who begin sexual relationships with students is the issue of conflict of interest and abuse of trust. Whether or not the student is taking any courses from the professor, if the relationship turns sour and the student makes a complaint of sexual harassment, then faculty members should know that they will bear most of the risks.
Jun 21, · Dating in Grad School Sign in to follow this (with food!) for Graduate Student Unions and the like. Cross-pollination of the disciplines often = success for grad student dating. 3 psycholinguist, ZeeMore21 and mechengr Why does the thought of dating a professor weird you out? I mean, if they’re your age and you have common interests.
This story has really struck a cord, thank you for sharing this link and supplying our first 20, visitor day! A transcribed letter from Robert Tjian From now on, I or someone designated by me will take attendance at group meetings starting at 9: If you are not there, I will not sign your salary sheets. The frequency of vacation, time taken off and other non-lab activities is bordering on the ridiculous.
In case you forgot, the standard amount of time you are supposed to take is 2 weeks a year total, including Christmas. I also want to say that the average lab citizenship and community spirit of keeping the lab in functioning order is at an all-time low. Few people seem to care about fixing broken equipment and making sure things in the lab run smoothly. If the lab were extremely productive and everyone was totally focused on their work, I might understand the slovenliness but productivity is abysmal and if we continue along this path we will surely reach mediocrity in no time.
Sign up for an appointment time on the sheet outside my door. Robert Tjian Update 5: Erick Carreira responds in an interview with Christopher Shea from The Boston Globe, vaguely claims the letter may have been a joke link: Chemist who ordered night and weekend work replies to critics. I wonder whether you would think it fair to be judged on the basis of a letter 14 years old, especially when the comments and rash judgments are made without knowledge of the context or the circumstances surrounding the individuals involved.
Indeed how does anyone out who is so quick to pass judgement and who is coming to conclusions know that it is not part of a year old joke or satire as you state that backfired?